Plant Protect. Sci., 2002, 38(11):322-324 | DOI: 10.17221/10480-PPS

Some pathogenic properties of Rhizoctonia solani to sugar beet seedlings

E.B. Moliszewska, J.H.M. Schneider
1 Department of Applied and Experimental Biology, University of Opole, 45-035 Opole, Poland
2 Institute of Sugar Beet Research (IRS), 4611 HL Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands E-mail: ewamoli@uni.opole.pl

Rhizoctonia solani causes various diseases in many crops world wide, it also causes losses in sugar beet grown in Poland and the Netherlands. In this research three isolates of R. solani was tested, two AG5 and one AG4. They differed in pathogenic activity in field and laboratory tests. The AG5 isolates were weak pathogenic but caused the decrease of cotyledons and first pair of leaves dimension. The AG4 isolate caused totally pre-emergence damping-off and its activity was the result of mycelium colonization ability and fungus metabolites activity.

Keywords: Rhizoctonia solani; sugar beet; plant dimension decrease; pathogenicity; culture filtrate

Published: December 31, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Moliszewska EB, Schneider JHM. Some pathogenic properties of Rhizoctonia solani to sugar beet seedlings. Plant Protect. Sci. 2002;38(SI 2 - 6th Conf EFPP):322-324. doi: 10.17221/10480-PPS.
Download citation

References

  1. DODMAN R.L., BARKER K.R., WALKER J.C. (1968): A detailed study of the different modes of penetration by Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology, 58: 1271-1276.
  2. FRANK J.A., FRANCIS S.K. (1976): The effect of Rhizoctonia silani phytotoxins on potatoes. Can. J. Bot., 54: 2536-2540. Go to original source...
  3. GARRET S.D. (1970): Pathogenic Root Infecting Fungi. The Iowa State University Press.
  4. IACOBELLIS N.S., DEVAY J.E. (1987): Studies on pathogenesis of Rhizoctonia solani in beans: an evaluation of the possible roles of phenylacetic acid and its hydroxy derivatives as phytotoxins. Physiol. Molec. Plant Pathol., 30: 421-432. Go to original source...
  5. PAPAVIZAS G.C., ADAMS P.B., LUMSDEN R.D., LEWIS J.A., DOW R.L., AYERS W.A., KANTZES J.G. (1975): Ecology and Epidemiology of Rhizoctonia solani in field soil. Phytopathology, 65: 871-877. Go to original source...
  6. RUBIN B., ARCICHOWSKA J. (1971): Biochemia i fizjologia odporno¶ci ro¶lin. PWRiL, Warszawa.
  7. SCHNEIDER J.H.M., SALAZAR O., KEIJER J., RUBIO V. (1997): Identification of Rhizoctonia solani associated with field-grown tulips using rITS-DNA polymorphism and pectic zymograms. Eur. J. Plant Path., 103: 607-622. Go to original source...
  8. SHERWOOD R.T., LINDBERG C.G. (1962): Production of a phytotoxin by Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology, 52: 586-587.
  9. WINDELS C.E., NABBEN D.J. (1989): Characterization and pathogenicity of anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani isolated from Beta vulgaris. Phytopathology, 79: 83-88. Go to original source...
  10. W INDELS C.E., K UNZIA R.A., C ALL J. (1997): Characterization and pathogenicity of Tanatephorus cucumeris from sugar beet in Minnesota. Plant Dis., 81: 245-249. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.